Ethnographics Gallery University of Kent

Turkish Village

Copyright 1965, 1994 Paul Stirling. All rights reserved.

Paul Stirling
CHAPTER TEN

RANK

previous page

Page 221


Rank

In every human group some members are more, some less admired and respected; some more, some less able to impose their will on others. Description and discussion of this universal hierarchical arrangement relies heavily on the word status. It is used to mean both a place on a scale, high and low status; and also, on the analogy of legal usage, a social position with its concomitant rights and duties, the status of husband or headman (e.g. Homans (1951) pp. 11-12, 179). Because of this ambiguity I prefer to avoid the word, and to use rank for the one meaning, and social position or role for the other.

In this wide sense, rank is partly a matter of an individual's place in a scale of prestige, and partly of an individual's place in a hierarchy of power. In practice the two scales largely coincide. Discrepancies certainly occur. A man may exercise power yet be despised for the ways he acquired it, while another may be admired for moral qualities yet exercise little power. The two scales tend to coalesce in time; power earns increasing respect, and respect brings increasing influence.

A scale of prestige is a matter of what people think of each other, and varies with the person who is doing the thinking. We must also distinguish admiration for personal qualities from deference given to social position. Personal dislike or pretension may prevent people from explicitly admitting, or even recognising, deference which they nevertheless display implicitly in their behaviour.

In spite of these difficulties it is possible to establish a rough overall hierarchy among the village men. In the guest rooms, in the mosques, at wedding feasts, people arrange themselves

next page
Contents Page