Previous Page




  reform have been even more so.  One of the most difficult tasks of the muhtar
is the collection of the village tax - the rates, one might call it in English.
Government taxes are collected by government officials, with the muhtar’s
official presence, but the money for the village chest is collected directly by
him.

For these reasons, the job is far from coveted, and sometimes there is even
difficulty in finding anyone to take it on.  Most of the muhtars I encountered
were young men.  Mustafa (son of AM) was only about thirty-five, and his
predecessor had been even younger.  Sometimes a young man like Mustafa,
who is fond of his own importance and insensitive to his neighbour’s feelings,
actively enjoys his duties, but the more self respecting and the older villagers
do not want the job and despite those who do.  These young men, who only
hold office because their elders and betters have no wish to do so, have no
power or prestige in village affairs, outside the carrying out of their duties,
and even in these they depend on official support from above.  They cannot
act as leaders in the village, nor have they any weight as arbitrators in case of
disputes and fights.  From the point of view of internal affairs the village has
no political head.  Certain situations lead to a spontaneous consultation and
even joint action; for example, a question about the village accounts, which I
shall describe below, or a border quarrel with another village, which may lead
to an armed expedition in defence.  But in these cases the muhtar carries no
weight in respect of his office, and has little chance of influencing the conduct
of his fellows, except by threatening to call in the gendarms, which he would
hardly dare to do without the general support of village opinion.

The muhtar’s odd jobs during my stay included a revision of the numbering of
village houses, the preparation of the electoral roll for the village,
arrangements for the making of a set of school desks, and for the enlargement
of the school building, and finding somewhere for me to live.  The numbering
of village houses is typical of an official order with which, being a
conspicuous matter, the village must comply.  These numbers serve only the
purpose of filling up the column for house number on official forms, the
village making absolutely no use of them, since everyone knows where
everyone else lives.  Yet they all had to find ten piastres (3d.) for a new
number plate, provided by the authorities.  Small as the sum was, the muhtar
had some difficulty in collecting all contributions.

In August 1950, throughout Turkey, elections for Muhtar were held.  In
Sakaltutan, for the first time, an official came out from the town to supervise,
and see that a proper election was held.  Only once before had an election for
muhtar been held, and that some fifteen years ago, to force out of office an



 



  unpopular muhtar.  The village law lays it down that the muhtar shall be
elected by all men and women over eighteen, but in practice the invariable
custom, unless an election is imposed, is for an unofficial gathering of the
more senior village men to decide on anyone who is willing to undertake the
duties.  If more than one is willing, then whoever will accept least money is
chosen.  It is not considered by the village to matter much who is muhtar so
long as he does not cause trouble, or attempt undue extortions.  The “election”
of the new muhtar was of this type in two neighbouring villages where no
official showed up to act as supervisor.  In Sakaltutan, a model election was
held, with a secret ballot. In spite of much talk, when the official arrived in
was still not clear who was going to stand.  The Lower Quarter had persuaded
Selahaddin (BA 4) to stand, in spite of his protests that a poor man could not
do the task worthily, and in the end the Upper Quarter, realising, I suspect,
that a split vote would mean a Lower Quarter victory, also put forward only
one candidate.  Though the issue was mainly Upper Quarter versus Lower
Quarter, it was also to a limited extent a clash between Haci Ahmet (SA 2),
who through his sister’s sons (BA), would have helped and influenced
Selahaddin and Haci Ali (DT 1), who will lend similar support and exercise
similar influence over Duran, his kinsman.  But this issue was comparatively
unimportant - without a formal election, Duran would probably have taken
office unopposed.

Soon after the election had begun, a large party from the Upper Quarter
arrived at the school, which was used as the polling booth, and went in to vote.
An argument started inside, and soon everyone was talking very loudly at
cross purposes.  The retiring muhtar, Mustafa, was saying he would willingly
carrying on in office on half the allowance, and there was a general cry of
“away with elections, let whoever will do the job cheapest, take it”.  A large
group went off as though intending to boycott the election, but I noticed that
they came back to vote one by the one later in the day.  In Ac village, a
similar disturbance actually stopped the election, and gendarmes were fetched
to restore order before it could proceed.

This indifference, even opposition, to a properly conducted election for the
office reflects clearly its unimportance from the village point of view.  The
muhtar has, in fact, become simply the government spokesman of the village,
and in most villages he is no longer, in any sense, the village leader, nor
thought of as such.

  3. The Council of Elder

  By law, every village must have a Council of Elders of four members, with



 



  four reserves to take the place of any of the four full members who for any

reason are unable to attend the meeting.  Since their names have to be reported

to the nahiye, and have to appear on every document that is sent from the

village to a superior authority, they have to be appointed.  They should, by

law, meet once a month in any case, and whenever else there is any business

for them to transact.  They should supervise the muhtar, audit the village

accounts, and discuss all village business.  In practice, they never meet as a

council at all.  Each has a stamp made of his name, which the muhtar keeps

and uses at his own discretion.  The muhtar did, on occasion, ask them

individually their opinions on certain matters, if he was in doubt.  He also

asked their help in time of emergency.  One night a man struck a female

cousin of his with an axe, because she had used his ox cart without permission.

Mustafa, on his way to see what had happened, called in and took Nazim (DT

3), who was one of the members.  But normally the muhtar takes any decision

and carries out any duties entirely on his own responsibility.  When any

important business arose, the word would go to the muhtar’s oda to discuss it.

Once, visiting the muhtar for another purpose, I found a large gathering in his

oda of people not normally in his social group, and discovered that there was

trouble over the village funds.  This group was the largest and most

vociferous I came across, but similar groups formed to discuss such matters as

the arrangements for the general election, and the election of muhtar.


The Council of Elders, with the muhtar and the village schoolmaster, does in

fact have one important function, namely the assessment of villagers for

contributions to the village chest, - the rates.  For this function, so likely to

lead to disputes, it is essential that all the main kabileler should feel themselves

adequately represented on the council, and for this reason the four members

are chosen from different kabile, and distributed over the whole village.  The

council should be elected, member by member, by the adult suffrage of the

village.  In the past they have been decided on in much the same way as the

muhtar.  In the past they have been decided on in much the same way as the

muhtar.  In the formal election of the muhtar  which I have just described,

each candidate for the office of muhtar simply chose eight men, in

consultation with his kin and neighbours, and people voted for these en bloc,



 



  when voting for muhtar.  The candidate had written out lists of them for use

as ballots, and the only way to vary the list would have been to write out one’s

own list, impossible for most of the village; and no one seems even to have

thought of so doing.  Both candidates placed the names of Osman (AG 1) and

Sevket (VA 4) among the reserves on their list, and so, with votes for both

sides, these two became first and second members of the council; but it makes

little difference, for, as I have said, the council has only one important duty -

the assessment of contributions of the village chest.


  4. Funds and Contributions


  In the eyes of the village, the most important responsibility of the muhtar is

care of public money, called literally the “Village Chest”.  apart from minor

or special sources, such as rent from anthropologists, this money is

contributed by all households according to an assessment carried out by all

households according to an assessment carried out by the Council of Elders.

The village households are divided into five classes, the maximum legal

contribution that can be demanded of the household in a year being 20 T.L.

(£2.10s.).  In Sakaltutan the contributions for 1949 were said to have been 15,

12, 10, 8 and 5 lira respectively for the five classes.  The total contributed

came to approximately 800 T.L. (#100).  The amount collected varies

annually according to needs.  Poverty following the bad harvest, and the

income from letting a part of the school meant much reduced contributions

for 1950.  From this sum the muhtar takes his own allowance, meets

government charges for stationery supplied to the village, buys the

watchman’s clothes, and also meets special village needs, such as school desks,

improvements to the water supply, and so on.  The only person in the village

who both understood sometimes of how to work the books in which the

accounts were supposed to be kept, and took any interest in village affairs, was

Ali Osman (BK 1).  The accounts should have been kept by the muhtar and

checked monthly by the Council of Elders, but since the Council never

troubled itself, and the muhtar could not read or write, Ali Osman did what

was necessary.  The muhtar previous to Mustafa (AM) had been Ali (SC 1),

Haci Ahmet’s (SA 2) adopted son, who although barely literate had handled



 



  the accounts himself.  Some months after he had given up the job, he was

called upon to hand over the books and the funds.  He declared that he had

spent all he had collected and that the balance of 500 T.L. was still

uncollected.  This occasioned a mass meeting of village elders and a lot of

shouting and bad temper.  Ali Osman found disorder in the accounts, and Ali

(SC 1) refused to account in detail for his expenditure.  But it all died down,

and Ali Osman told me that Ali had paid over 24 T.L. He said there was more

to it than that, and that the same sort of thing was true for past years.  But, he

explained, to press the matter would have meant a serious break in the village,

and no one wanted that.  In fact, the only way to bring pressure to bear on Ali

would have been to have called in the authorities, and the village would be

solidly against embroiled itself in a public enquiry into its finances, in which

too much might come to light, and which would bring disgrace on the village

among its neighbours.  It was said that all muhtars profit by their office, and

with so haphazard a system of accountancy, it would be hard to prove that this

is not the case.  Apart from this system, invented and imposed for above, and

mainly used to meet official expenditure, there are traditional contributions

which do not pass through the village chest, but go direct to the persons

concerned.  The watchman, the village imam, and the herdsmen all collect

their own reward household by household, which is usually paid, and often

assessed, in kind, and gathered in annually at the time of threshing.


  5. Other Village Functionaries


  Every village has by law a watchman, who is responsible for messenger

duties, and public menial tasks.  In theory he should also act as village

policeman.  The remuneration of these watchmen is so little that only those

who, in spite of serous poverty, do not go to town to work, are prepared to

take on the job.  The watchman tends to be one of the poorest and most

feckless people in the village.  He is treated by the muhtar as a personal

servant, not only waiting on guests, but also doing other menial tasks less

obviously connected with the muhtar’s public duties.  His tenure is annual, but

the present watchman in Sakaltutan has held office for two or three years, and

seems likely to continue unless a new muhtar objects to him.  In AC village the



Next Page    -

Return to Stirling Archives